After getting these settings right jumping back and forward between different software packages isn't really an issue. It is not so bad as long as you use applications that allow settings for color management. Something I can confirm that color management under Windows can make life a bit complicated sometimes. Differences between the two work places were minimal, considering that I use two pairs of differetn monitor models that are both calibrated, but used under differetn lighting conditions. With my setup I could not see visible differences between JPG's using the programs I mentioned above. When looking at processed photos I was more concerned about differences between what I see in the raw processor and the viewer rather then between dfferent viewers, so I will definitely have a closer look with my equipment, which currently is a DELL Precision M6800 with a 4GB AMD Graphics and connected to either two DELL UP2716D or two DELL U2413 - depending on the location where I am working -, in both cases connected via miniDP through a docking station. On the viewer side used IrfanView and then moved to XNViewMP because of its much better organizing and meta data management functions as well as the multi-platform availability (beside photos I have to juggle big quantities of graphics that I manage by using key words). I have been using several raw processing packages in the past (View NX2, Capture NX2, vIew NX-i, Capture NX-D, Capture One) and am now using DxO PhotoLab 4.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |